Soul

Soul names a clearly demarcated functional complex in the psyche—best described as a “personality”—distinct from psyche as totality of all psychic processes. Related: anima / animus; persona; soul-ima

Soul

1. Etymology

Soul names a clearly demarcated functional complex in the psyche—best described as a “personality”—distinct from psyche as totality of all psychic processes. Related: anima / animus; persona; soul-image; eros; logos; German Seele.


2. Plain summary

Jung keeps theological uses carefully apart from the technical sense. Psyche = all psychic processes; soul = a bounded functional complex (a personality). Partial manifestations: anima/animus and persona. In later transference/alchemy writing: the soul accruing to ego-consciousness in the opus is feminine in the man (anima wanting to reconcile and unite) and masculine in the woman (animus trying to discern and discriminate).

Soul-image (related lemma territory): contrasexual inner personality in dreams/projections—impassioned magical relationships often carry projected soul-images. Samuels tracks the Definitions distinction and the Seele/soul overlap with psyche in ordinary speech.

Examples (exhaustive house list for this Index lemma — common soul motifs named across Jung’s essays and standard Jungian lexica; not a claim that Jung’s CW contains only these):
functional complex / personality; vs psyche as totality; anima/animus and persona as partial manifestations; opus soul feminine/masculine character; soul-image projection; kinship with eros / logos; Seele English difficulty.


3. Academic elucidation

In analytical psychology soul is a technical demarcation within psyche—personality-complex, not synonym of psyche-as-totality. Lexica (Sharp; Samuels pp. 140) supply paraphrase Do not invent loci.

4. Lexicon

Sharp (1991)

Soul. A functional complex in the psyche. (See also Eros, Logos and soul-image.) … By psyche I understand the totality of all psychic processes… By soul… a clearly demarcated functional complex that can best be described as a “personality.” … The “soul” which accrues to ego-consciousness during the opus has a feminine character in the man and a masculine character in a woman.

(Sharp, 1991) — cites CW 6 ¶797; CW 16 ¶522.

Samuels, Shorter & Plaut (1986) — soul p. 140

soul In the ‘Definitions’… Jung has under the entry for psyche: ‘see “soul”’. On balance, Jung refers more often to PSYCHE rather than soul when discussing the totality of all psychic processes… But it is also possible to tease out certain specific usages of ‘soul’: (1) … underline movement at depth… (2) … non-material aspect… core, heart, centre… (3) … ‘soul-making’ (Hillman)…

(Samuels, Shorter, & Plaut, 1986/2013, p. 140)


5. CW concordance — sample, not exhaustive

I have been compelled, in my investigations into the structure of the unconscious, to make a conceptual distinction between soul and psyche. By psyche I understand the totality of all psychic processes, conscious as well as unconscious. By soul, on the other hand, I understand a clearly demarcated functional complex that can best be described as a “personality.”
(Jung, 1921/1971, CW 6, p. 640, ¶797) Dual psyche untouched.

It will be clear from all this that the “soul” which accrues to ego-consciousness during the opus has a feminine character in the man and a masculine character in the woman. His anima wants to reconcile and unite; her animus tries to discern and discriminate.
(Jung, 1946/1966, CW 16, p. 304, ¶522) Dual anima / animus untouched.


See also: psyche; anima; animus; persona; eros; logos; sensation; shadow.

References

Jung, C. G. (1966). The psychology of the transference. In H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, & W. McGuire (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.) (2nd ed., Vol. 16, p. 304, ¶522). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1946)

Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological types [Definitions]. In H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, & W. McGuire (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.) (Vol. 6, p. 640, ¶797). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1921)

Samuels, A., Shorter, B., & Plaut, F. (1986). A critical dictionary of Jungian analysis. Routledge.

Sharp, D. (1991). Jung lexicon: A primer of terms & concepts. Inner City Books.


} } } } } }